When a healthcare organisation needs to appoint a senior executive, one of the first decisions is how the recruitment process should be structured.
Some appointments are managed through contingent recruitment, where a fee is generally payable only if the recruitment firm introduces the successful candidate.
Others are conducted through a healthcare executive-search process, where the organisation appoints a search partner to undertake a dedicated and comprehensive assignment.
Both models can be effective in the right circumstances. However, they are designed for different types of recruitment challenge.
For a senior, confidential or difficult-to-fill healthcare appointment, understanding the distinction can help boards and executives choose the approach most likely to produce a strong and sustainable outcome.
What is contingent recruitment?
Under a contingent recruitment model, a recruitment firm generally receives a fee if a candidate it introduces is appointed.
The organisation may engage one recruiter exclusively, or it may brief several agencies at the same time.
The recruiter will usually search its existing database, advertise the position, contact relevant people within its network and present candidates who appear suitable.
Contingent recruitment can work particularly well when:
- The position has a relatively broad candidate market
- Suitable candidates are actively looking for work
- The role is not confidential
- The organisation needs to recruit quickly
- The required skill set is readily available
- The position is at a professional, operational or middle-management level
- Several suitable candidates are likely to respond to advertising
- The organisation is comfortable managing parts of the process internally
The model can be efficient because the organisation generally pays the recruitment fee when an appointment is made.
However, the amount of research and proactive market engagement undertaken may vary depending on the recruiter, the assignment and the likelihood of a successful placement.
What is retained executive search?
Retained executive search is a research-led and consultative recruitment model typically used for senior, specialised or business-critical appointments.
The organisation appoints a search firm to lead a defined assignment. The fee is usually paid in agreed stages during the search rather than being entirely dependent on the final placement.
The retained search partner may support the organisation with:
- Defining the appointment mandate
- Consulting with key stakeholders
- Reviewing the role and selection criteria
- Developing the candidate proposition
- Conducting market research
- Mapping relevant organisations and potential candidates
- Approaching passive candidates confidentially
- Interviewing and assessing candidates
- Providing market feedback
- Preparing longlist and shortlist reports
- Supporting interviews and selection
- Conducting references and due diligence
- Managing the offer and candidate transition
A retained search is not simply a payment arrangement. It is a commitment by both the organisation and the search partner to conduct a thorough process.
What is the main difference?
The main difference is the scope and structure of the assignment.
Contingent recruitment is generally focused on introducing an appointable candidate.
Retained search is generally focused on conducting a comprehensive examination of the relevant candidate market and helping the client make an informed appointment.
This affects how the work is approached.
A retained search partner is usually appointed exclusively and is expected to invest significant time in research, stakeholder consultation, candidate engagement and assessment.
A contingent recruiter may be working alongside other agencies and may therefore focus first on candidates who are already known, readily available or likely to move quickly.
Neither approach is inherently better in every situation. The most appropriate model depends on the level of the role, the complexity of the search and the risk associated with making the wrong appointment.
Why senior healthcare appointments are different
Senior healthcare leadership roles often require an uncommon combination of capabilities.
A successful candidate may need to demonstrate:
- Executive leadership
- Healthcare-sector knowledge
- Clinical or professional credibility
- Governance experience
- Financial and operational capability
- Workforce leadership
- Government and stakeholder engagement
- Experience influencing senior clinicians
- Understanding of patient safety and quality
- The ability to lead through complexity or change
The available candidate market can narrow quickly once all of these requirements are considered.
A hospital may need a Chief Operating Officer who understands complex clinical operations. A health service may require a Director of Medical Services with the right professional qualifications, leadership experience and willingness to relocate. A board may be seeking a CEO capable of managing significant reform while maintaining the confidence of clinicians, employees, government and the community.
In these circumstances, the strongest candidates may not be actively applying for advertised positions.
They may need to be identified, approached and engaged in a confidential conversation before they will consider the opportunity.
When is contingent recruitment appropriate?
Contingent recruitment may be suitable when the organisation is confident that a reasonable number of qualified candidates are available and likely to respond.
It may also be appropriate when:
- The appointment is relatively straightforward
- The role has commonly understood responsibilities
- The organisation has strong internal recruitment capability
- The position can be openly advertised
- The candidate market is active
- The organisation does not require extensive market mapping
- The internal team can manage stakeholder consultation and assessment
- The cost or risk associated with a prolonged vacancy is manageable
For some healthcare management and professional appointments, an experienced contingent recruiter with a strong network may produce an excellent result.
The organisation should still clarify how the recruiter will approach the market, assess candidates and manage communication throughout the process.
When is retained search more appropriate?
A retained search may be more appropriate where the appointment is senior, specialised, confidential or strategically important.
This can include situations where:
- The appointment is at CEO, C-suite or executive-director level
- The organisation needs to reach passive candidates
- The potential candidate pool is limited
- The role requires a combination of clinical and executive capability
- The organisation is located in a regional or rural area
- Previous advertising has not produced a suitable shortlist
- The current executive has not announced their departure
- The organisation needs to maintain strict confidentiality
- The appointment is likely to attract board, workforce, government or community attention
- The organisation is undergoing substantial transformation
- The selection criteria require further definition
- Internal stakeholders have different views about the ideal candidate
- The organisation requires detailed market intelligence
- The cost of a poor appointment would be significant
A retained process can also be valuable where the organisation wants a search partner to represent the opportunity carefully and consistently to senior candidates.
Accessing passive candidates
One of the most important distinctions between general recruitment and executive search is the level of proactive candidate engagement.
Senior executives may not be monitoring job advertisements or actively submitting applications. They may be performing well in their current positions and would only consider moving for a compelling opportunity.
A search process should identify potential candidates across relevant organisations and approach them directly.
This requires more than sending a generic message.
Senior candidates are likely to want an informed discussion about:
- The purpose of the appointment
- The organisation's strategy
- The board or executive leadership
- Why the role is available
- The scope and authority of the position
- The challenges the successful candidate will inherit
- The organisation's culture and reputation
- Remuneration and contractual arrangements
- Location and flexibility
- The selection process
- What success will look like
The person representing the organisation needs sufficient knowledge and credibility to conduct that conversation effectively.
Market mapping and market intelligence
A retained search should provide the organisation with insight into the wider candidate market, not only the candidates who reach the final shortlist.
Market mapping may help the organisation understand:
- Which organisations employ relevant leaders
- How comparable roles are structured
- Where strong potential candidates are located
- How potential candidates perceive the opportunity
- Whether the remuneration is competitive
- Which parts of the brief are limiting candidate interest
- What motivates suitable candidates to consider moving
- Whether relocation expectations are realistic
- Which emerging leaders may be suitable in the future
This information can influence the current appointment and support longer-term succession planning.
For example, if several credible candidates express concern about the scope of the role, reporting structure or remuneration, the organisation may need to revisit those elements.
A search partner should communicate this feedback honestly, even when it is difficult to hear.
Exclusivity and accountability
Retained searches are generally conducted exclusively.
This gives one search partner responsibility for managing the organisation's message, candidate contact, research and reporting.
Exclusivity can reduce the risk of senior candidates being approached repeatedly by different recruiters about the same opportunity.
It can also support:
- Consistent communication
- Clear ownership of candidate relationships
- Better coordination with the client
- Greater confidentiality
- More detailed market research
- A structured timetable
- Transparent progress reporting
- Clear accountability for the process
Using several agencies can increase the number of recruiters contacting the market, but it does not always increase the depth of the search.
In a limited senior candidate market, multiple approaches can sometimes create confusion or make the opportunity appear less controlled.
How do the fees differ?
Contingent recruitment fees are commonly payable when a candidate introduced by the recruiter accepts or commences the position.
Retained search fees are generally paid in stages, reflecting the work undertaken throughout the assignment.
The exact structure varies between firms, but staged payments may be connected to:
- Commencement of the assignment
- Completion of research or presentation of a longlist
- Delivery of a shortlist
- Successful appointment
Boards and executives should compare more than the headline percentage.
They should also examine:
- The work included in the fee
- Whether the search is exclusive
- Who will personally lead the assignment
- The depth of market research
- Candidate-assessment methods
- Reporting arrangements
- Reference and due-diligence support
- Advertising and assessment costs
- Replacement or appointment guarantees
- Any restrictions on approaching candidates
- Additional expenses
- Support through offer and transition
A lower fee does not necessarily represent better value if the process does not reach the strongest potential candidates.
Equally, a retained fee should be supported by a clearly defined and rigorous search methodology.
Does retained search guarantee a better candidate?
No recruitment model can guarantee that a particular person will accept the role or succeed after appointment.
A retained process does not remove the need for strong client decision-making, careful assessment or effective onboarding.
It should, however, provide the organisation with a more comprehensive view of the available market and a structured basis for making its decision.
The quality of the outcome will depend on factors including:
- The clarity of the appointment mandate
- The attractiveness of the opportunity
- The credibility and reach of the search partner
- The availability of suitable candidates
- The organisation's remuneration and conditions
- The speed and quality of the selection process
- Candidate experience
- The accuracy of assessment
- The quality of references and due diligence
- The organisation's onboarding and executive support
Search is one part of a successful appointment. The organisation must remain actively involved throughout the process.
The importance of defining the role first
An executive search should not begin with an outdated position description and a request to find someone similar to the previous leader.
Before choosing a recruitment model, the organisation should define:
- Why the appointment is being made
- What the successful candidate must achieve
- The organisation's strategic priorities
- The challenges the executive will inherit
- The capabilities that are genuinely essential
- The experience that is desirable but not mandatory
- The leadership style required
- The stakeholder relationships involved
- The authority attached to the role
- The candidate proposition
- How success will be measured
A search firm can help facilitate this discussion, but the board or executive team must ultimately agree on the mandate.
Without that clarity, even a comprehensive search can produce candidates who meet different stakeholders' competing interpretations of the role.
What should a retained search partner provide?
A retained search partner should offer clear deliverables and consistent communication.
The organisation should expect:
- Detailed stakeholder consultation
- A documented search brief
- A clear candidate profile
- A market research and sourcing strategy
- Direct engagement with passive candidates
- Regular written or verbal progress updates
- Honest market feedback
- Evidence of the organisations and candidate groups researched
- Structured candidate interviews
- Detailed candidate reports
- Transparent discussion of candidate strengths and risks
- Interview and selection support
- References and agreed due diligence
- Offer and negotiation support
- Professional candidate communication
- Confidentiality throughout the assignment
The search partner should also be willing to advise the client when expectations are unrealistic or when the market is responding differently from anticipated.
Questions to ask before choosing a recruitment model
Boards and healthcare executives may find it useful to consider the following questions:
- How senior or business-critical is the appointment?
- How limited is the relevant candidate market?
- Are the strongest candidates likely to be actively job seeking?
- Does the organisation need to maintain confidentiality?
- Has the role been difficult to fill previously?
- Is the appointment likely to require interstate or international relocation?
- Does the position require specialist clinical or professional qualifications?
- Does the organisation need detailed market intelligence?
- Is there internal agreement about the candidate profile?
- Who will manage stakeholder consultation?
- Who will proactively identify and approach potential candidates?
- How will candidates be assessed?
- What are the consequences of a prolonged vacancy?
- What are the consequences of appointing the wrong person?
- Does the organisation have the internal capacity to manage the process thoroughly?
The answers will help determine whether a contingent process is sufficient or whether a retained search is justified.
Can the two approaches be combined?
Some organisations use a hybrid or exclusive contingent model.
Under this arrangement, one recruitment firm may receive an exclusive period to work on the appointment, while all or part of the fee remains linked to a successful outcome.
This can work where the role requires more commitment than a standard multi-agency assignment but does not require the full scope of a retained executive search.
The important issue is not the label applied to the model.
The organisation should clearly understand:
- What work will be undertaken
- How much market research is included
- Whether passive candidates will be approached
- How the recruiter will prioritise the assignment
- What reporting will be provided
- How long exclusivity will apply
- When fees become payable
- What happens if the search is paused or cancelled
- What appointment guarantee is included
A clearly documented process helps prevent different expectations developing after the search has commenced.
Choosing the right approach
Contingent recruitment can be an effective and efficient option for many healthcare appointments.
Retained search is generally most valuable where the role is senior, specialised, confidential or difficult to fill, and where the organisation needs a comprehensive assessment of the available candidate market.
The decision should reflect the complexity and importance of the appointment rather than being based only on the initial fee structure.
For boards and executives, the central question is:
What level of research, engagement and assessment is required to give the organisation confidence that it has considered the strongest available candidates?
Vitalis Recruit supports Australian healthcare organisations with executive search, medical-leadership recruitment, confidential appointments, interim leadership and proactive market mapping.
We tailor the search approach to the organisation, the position and the realities of the candidate market.
Planning a senior healthcare or medical-leadership appointment? Contact Vitalis Recruit for a confidential discussion about the most appropriate search approach.